Background The incidence of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) in Azerbaijan has never been calculated with a prospective study, using Echo-2D as a study method
Aim First prospective epidemiology study calculating incidence and types of CHD in Baku, Azerbaijan.
Population-method From June 2016 to August 2018, 2570 term neonates were screened in 2 major maternity units. The screening was randomized to equal females/males with no known previous obstetric alert regarding CHD. Scanning was done by two teams of pediatric cardiologists in echo-2D. Each team was ‘blinded’ to the findings of each other. All scans were recorded, and a third senior physician reevaluated them.
Results From 2570 term neonates of the general population we detected 47 CHD’s. From them, 17 were c-CHD and 5, s-CHD. 25 were simple or moderate complex non-cyanotic CHD. The estimated incidence was 1.828%. 17/47 (36.2%) were cyanotic. The incidence of simple CHD was 25/47(53.2%). Analysis of the specific anatomy is presented in table 1.
Conclusions This first-ever prospective epidemiology study in Azerbaijan involving a cohort equal to 1.65% of the annual living births of the country, estimated a high incidence. This is among the highest reported globally. The amount of critical & cyanotic CHD was 46.8% and 36.2% respectable. These high numbers are possibly related to an isolated population and conjugated marriage customs of the country. This represents a public population health burden.
Oster ME, Lee KA, Honein MA, Riehle-Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1502–8.
Sankar MJ, Natarajan CK, Das RR, Agarwal R, Chandrasekaran A, Paul VK. When do newborns die? A systematic review of timing of overall and cause-specific neonatal deaths in developing countries. J Perinatol. 2016;36(Suppl 1):S1–11.
Bairoliya N, Fink G. Causes of death and infant mortality rates among full-term births in the United States between 2010 and 2012: an observational study. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002531.
van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2241–7.
Triedman JK, Newburger JW. Trends in congenital heart disease: the next decade. Circulation. 2016;133:2716–33.
Liu Y, Chen S, Zuhlke L, Black GC, Choy MK, Li N, et al. Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970-2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:455–63.
Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation. 2007;115:163–72.
Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Presentation of congenital heart disease in infancy: implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;80:F49–53.
Hill GD, Block JR, Tanem JB, Frommelt MA. Disparities in the prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:859–63.
van Velzen CL, Clur SA, Rijlaarsdam ME, Bax CJ, Pajkrt E, Heymans MW, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease--results of a national screening programme. BJOG. 2016;123:400–7.
Naik RJ, Shah NC. Teenage heart murmurs. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2014;61:1–16.
Begic E, Begic Z. Accidental heart murmurs. Med Arch. 2017;71:284–7.
Azhar AS, Habib HS. Accuracy of the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in neonates: do we need an echocardiogram? Pediatr Cardiol. 2006;27:234–7.
Gokmen Z, Tunaoglu FS, Kula S, Ergenekon E, Ozkiraz S, Olgunturk R. Comparison of initial evaluation of neonatal heart murmurs by pediatrician and pediatric cardiologist. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:1086–91.
Minocha P, Agarwal A, Jivani N, Swaminathan S. Evaluation of neonates with suspected congenital heart disease: a new cost-effective algorithm. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57:1541–8.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.